One letter and one date will do, thanks.

In H.C. Equities v. County of Union, the New Jersey Supreme Court ruled that H.C. Equities failed to file a timely Tort Claims Act claim against its commercial tenant and that a finding of substantial compliance cannot be premised on comments by plaintiff’s counsel in three different letters with three different dates sent to the  defendant’s lawyers.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]