New Jersey State Bar Association headquarters. Credit: Google Q&A with the NJSBA Cannabis Law Committee on New Jersey's new law legalizing recreational marijuana
The New Jersey State Bar Association (NJSBA) submitted its report and recommendations to the Cannabis Regulatory Commission (CRC) last summer on the rules and regulations promulgated by the CRC on the state's new law that legalized recreational marijuana for adults 21 and over. Many of those recommendations were adopted by the CRC in issuing the regulations. The Bar Report asked NJSBA Cannabis Law Committee Co-Chairs Joshua S. Bauchner, of Ansell Grimm and Aaron, in Woodland Park, and Lisa Gora, of Wilentz, Goldman and Spitzer, in Woodbridge, about some of the legal ramifications concerning the new state law and what follows is a compilation of their responses.BAR REPORT - Oct. 18, 2021
Q&A with NJSBA Cannabis Law Committee co-chairs. NJ Supreme Court implements diversity, inclusion and community engagement recommendations. Latest issue of NJSBA publication focuses on insurance.
October 18, 2021 at 08:00 AM
10 minute read
Bar Associations
New Jersey State Bar Association headquarters. Credit: Google
Q&A with the NJSBA Cannabis Law Committee on New Jersey's new law legalizing recreational marijuana
The New Jersey State Bar Association (NJSBA) submitted its report and recommendations to the Cannabis Regulatory Commission (CRC) last summer on the rules and regulations promulgated by the CRC on the state's new law that legalized recreational marijuana for adults 21 and over. Many of those recommendations were adopted by the CRC in issuing the regulations. The Bar Report asked NJSBA Cannabis Law Committee Co-Chairs Joshua S. Bauchner, of Ansell Grimm and Aaron, in Woodland Park, and Lisa Gora, of Wilentz, Goldman and Spitzer, in Woodbridge, about some of the legal ramifications concerning the new state law and what follows is a compilation of their responses.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
NJ Legal Awards 2024: Attorney of the Year, Law Firm of the Year Announced
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
