How Not to Handle the Trial of an Employment Case
A hypothetical case provides a crash course on employment litigation, including the after-acquired evidence doctrine, the cat's paw doctrine, stray remarks and the same actor inference.
March 09, 2022 at 02:00 PM
8 minute read
Employment LawWe live in an age of specialization. This includes the legal profession. It is now harder than ever to dabble in all types of litigation. This is especially true in the employment area. The after-acquired evidence doctrine, the cat's paw doctrine, stray remarks and the same actor inference all are unique to employment litigation, as the following hypothetical illustrates.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllJudge Approves $667K Settlement Against Independence Blue Cross for Unpaid, Pre-Shift Computer Work
4 minute readLawyers Warn: Little-Noticed Report Could Spell Bad News for Employers
6 minute readDon't Rush to Change That Noncompete Just Yet, Employment Lawyers Advise
5 minute readTrending Stories
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250