With the advent of spring, we got to thinking about some of the “lighter” questions confronting our profession. One such question is whether anything of importance is accomplished by starting an argument before an appellate court with, “May it please the Court.” What is accomplished by those words? Is it a lawyer’s way of expressing the hope that the words that follow will be a source of satisfaction to the judges? If so, it likely is a waste of time. The court will or will not be pleased by the arguments set forth in the briefs previously submitted.

Some time ago, Judge Jon O. Newman of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit expressed the view that the words, “May it Please the Court” may be the only words uttered by the lawyer that are not immediately challenged. We do not wish to be understood as objecting to the time-honored phrase, but upon reflection, we’re not sure that it really serves a useful purpose. It is doubtful that any presiding appellate judge will admonish a lawyer for saying those words, but on the other hand, it might be worthwhile to just say, “Good Morning” or “Good Afternoon” (as the case may be). In the final analysis, who knows what will please the court? We hazard the answer that shorter briefs with fewer points might be a start.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]