Think, Talk and Operate Like It's 2022
The NJ Insurance Fair Conduct Act now allows a claimant to bring a first-party claim directly against an automobile insurer if it engages in an "unreasonable delay or unreasonable denial of a claim for payment of benefits" under UM or UIM provisions.
April 21, 2022 at 12:00 PM
8 minute read
You think you are a reasonable person. You know the reasonable and fair price of everything—or you did at the end of 2019, before 2020's COVID, before 2021's supply chain/inflation, and before Russia's 2022 war on Ukraine. As experienced litigators in 2019 and before, we either pushed or resisted the pace of discovery in a relatively reasonable manner. We participated in mandatory non-binding arbitration with a mixture of hope and reticence. We sometimes relied on experienced and retired trial judges to convince our respective clients of value, and we could ultimately turn to a jury of peers to find the true value of the case. With those mechanical gears rusty or broken, we need to go electric. We need to understand that our context has changed and reinvigorate our sense of pace, and upwardly adjust the concept of value. Don't walk away yet—whether you litigate or not, what you think is reasonable is important.
It is not 2019 anymore. What you could buy for $1.00 in 2020 now costs approximately $1.10, unless of course we are talking about the price of gas, meat, eggs, and wheat which are up over 20%. Gem's Bagels in Port Monmouth, New Jersey, is putting their customers on notice that the price of wheat is up 250% since February. New Jersey Turnpike and Garden State Parkway tolls are indexed to increase 36% and 27% respectively. Put in settlement dollars, a million-dollar recovery today has the same buying power that $900,000 did in 2020 (in other words, you need $1.1 million today to equal $1.0 million yesterday). Today's economic reality should have all of us rethinking our finances and insurance. We should be asking ourselves what happens if we are hurt. How do we replace our income, our rent, our homes, our cars? What if we are hospitalized, if we need job retraining, if we need a caretaker for a month, three months, or for the remainder of life? If one can think critically about their own worth and replacement costs, one can be reasonable with others when it comes to value.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAppellate Division Rejects Third Circuit Interpretation of NJ Law, Says No Arbitration for Insurance Fraud
4 minute readNJ Justices Mull Insurer's Duty to Defend Employer's Negligence Claim in Workers' Comp Dispute
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Law Firms Report Wide Growth, Successful Billing Rate Increases and Less Merger Interest
- 2CLOs Face Mounting Pressure as Risks Mushroom and Job Duties Expand
- 3X Faces Intense Scrutiny as EU Investigation Races to Conclusion & Looming Court Battle
- 4'Nation Is in Trouble': NY Lawmakers Advance Bill to Set Parameters for Shielding Juror IDs in Criminal Matters
- 5Margolis Edelstein Broadens Leadership With New Co-Managing Partner
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250