Plaintiffs are unhappy with a New Jersey appeals court’s revision of rules governing when recording devices or third-party observers can be present when a plaintiff undergoes a defense-ordered medical or psychological examination.

The appeals court has revoked case law carrying a presumption that recording devices were allowed in the examination room, and in place directed that use of such devices is up to the trial judge.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]