![signing contract, lawyer watching](http://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/399/2022/08/Bar-Talk-SCOTUS-767x633.jpg)
Attorney Review of Palimony Agreements Is No Longer Required
According to a recent decision by the Supreme Court of New Jersey, people in cohabiting, non-marital relationships no longer need to hire attorneys to review their palimony agreements for them to be considered enforceable and valid.
August 10, 2022 at 10:00 AM
7 minute read
Before 2010, palimony agreements, including those that were made orally, were enforceable under New Jersey common law. However, the New Jersey Legislature amended the state's Statute of Frauds and required palimony agreements to be in writing and with the advice of counsel. Recently, the Supreme Court of New Jersey issued a decision in Moynihan v. Lynch, No. A-64-20, 085157 (N.J.S.Ct. March 8, 2022), after granting certification from the Appellate Division to determine the constitutionality of the requirement for both parties to a palimony agreement to have the advice of independent counsel.
Factual and Procedural Background
Kathleen Moynihan and Edward Lynch began their relationship in 1997 while Moynihan was working as a flight attendant and Lynch was working as an airline pilot. At the time, Moynihan was going through a divorce and lived with her children in Mansfield. Following her divorce in 2000, Moynihan's former husband stopped paying the mortgage. Facing foreclosure, Moynihan and her children were forced to move.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![Reminder: Court Rules and Statutes Apply to Pendente Lite Custody Decisions Reminder: Court Rules and Statutes Apply to Pendente Lite Custody Decisions](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/83/6d/d5bb63c14927a33cbc565fcf7679/family-law-767x633-3.jpg)
Reminder: Court Rules and Statutes Apply to Pendente Lite Custody Decisions
8 minute read![Attorney of the Year Finalist: Matheu Nunn's Supreme Court Successes Attorney of the Year Finalist: Matheu Nunn's Supreme Court Successes](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/399/2024/10/Matheu-Nunn-767x633.jpg)
Attorney of the Year Finalist: Matheu Nunn's Supreme Court Successes
Trending Stories
- 1Judge Pauses Deadline for Federal Workers to Accept Trump Resignation Offer
- 2DeepSeek Isn’t Yet Impacting Legal Tech Development. But That Could Soon Change.
- 3'Landmark' New York Commission Set to Study Overburdened, Under-Resourced Family Courts
- 4Wave of Commercial Real Estate Refinance Could Drown Property Owners
- 5Redeveloping Real Estate After Natural Disasters: Challenges, Strategies and Opportunities
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250