As the trend in remote and hybrid work has continued to grow in popularity, applications permitting real-time collaboration between employees plays an important role for businesses. With heightened ease of use and convenience, however, comes a duty for businesses and organizations to employ best practices regarding their responsibilities in maintaining the electronically stored information (ESI) that these applications create. Litigants must also remain mindful of evolving types of ESI when demanding information from opposing parties and non-parties to support their claims and defenses in litigation. 

The Duty to Preserve

The duty to preserve arises where “(1) there is pending or likely litigation and knowledge of this fact by the alleged spoliating party, (2) the evidence is relevant to litigation, and (3) the opposing party would be prejudiced by the destruction or disposal of the evidence.” Cockerline v. Menendez, 411 N.J. Super. 596, 620 (App. Div.), certif. denied, 201 N.J. 499 (2010). Keep in mind that a party can be sanctioned for failing to preserve ESI regardless of whether the failure to preserve was negligent or intentional. Rosenblit v. Zimmerman, 166 N.J. 391, 401-02 (2001); Jerista v. Murray, 185 N.J. 175, 201 (2005). 

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]