In the course of the COVID pandemic, Gov. Murphy signed a number of executive orders designed to protect New Jersey citizens. Some argued that those executive orders trampled on our constitutional rights, and those criticisms resurfaced recently during the state Senate hearing that culminated in Matt Platkin’s confirmation as attorney general. In response to those criticisms, Richard Codey – the state senator and former Governor – said, “When the Coronavirus hit, I didn’t give a damn what the Constitution said. I wanted us to be safe, I wanted to beat the virus.”

This editorial is not about COVID, Gov. Murphy, or Attorney General Platkin. In particular, it’s not about whether Gov. Murphy’s executive orders violated the Constitution. It’s about what happens when elected officials view the Constitution as an impediment to otherwise appropriate legislative goals.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]