The Internet has intensified the Court's efforts to apply traditional minimum contact tenets to personal jurisdiction. Since International Shoe v. Washington, 326 U.S. 310 (1945), where the court extended the application of personal jurisdiction to any matter wherein a defendant has minimum contacts with the jurisdiction, so long as fair play and substantial justice are maintained. Consequently, personal jurisdiction may arise when Internet users intentionally avail themselves of access to Internet servers associated with specific jurisdictions. More specifically, Internet server information constitutes a basis for intentional availment and in turn Internet personal jurisdiction.