The Third Circuit’s November remand of an order dismissing a petition to confirm an international arbitration award in Jiangsu Beier Decoration Materials Co., Ltd. v. Angle World LLC, 52 F. 4th 554 (3rd Cir. 2022), provides key lessons in the complexity of international arbitration.

Arbitrating a transnational commercial dispute subject to the New York Convention often is preferred to litigating in the domestic courts of one party or the other. Not only do such arbitrations have the possibility of avoiding the expense and delay of some court systems (including from U.S.-style discovery), but also international tribunals (whether sited in a party’s home city or in a “neutral” country) are thought less likely to impose local prejudice or political considerations on the process.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]