'Lack of Supervision' Has Its Cost: Employer of Sexual Abuser Ordered to Pay $450K
"Hopefully, this verdict reinforces the concept to any organization that it must properly supervise all employees and facilities and train its employees as to risks and signs of child sexual abuse," said Jay Silvio Mascolo, the lawyer for the plaintiff.
February 10, 2023 at 01:19 PM
4 minute read
A New Jersey city has been ordered to pay $450,000 to a man who claimed he was sexually abused by a firefighter as a child between 1988 and 1994.
A jury entered a verdict for $331,000 against Perth Amboy on Feb. 6, following a two-week trial before Superior Court Judge Christopher Rafano. But the award will rise to $450,000 under a pretrial high-low agreement between the parties.
The verdict is the first case to go to trial under New Jersey's 2019 law extending the statute of limitations for sexual abuse, and the first time a public entity was held negligent under the law for sexual abuse committed by its employee, said Jay Silvio Mascolo of Rebenack, Aronow & Mascolo in New Brunswick, who represented plaintiff Shay Guiod.
Mascolo teamed with Matthew Bonanno of his firm and Michael Pfau and Vincent Nappo of Pfau Cochran Vertetis Amala in Seattle to represent Guiod.
The lawyer for Perth Amboy, Peter King of King Moench & Collins in Morris Plains, did not respond to a request for comment.
Guiod is now 44 and living in San Jose, California.
The suit claimed Guiod's abuser, Hugo Fleites, was allowed by the city to use his positions as firefighter, community leader and counselor to sexually abuse Guiod countless times, starting when the plaintiff was 8 years old. Fleites was a friend of Guiod's family, and Guiod testified that Fleites abused him more than 30 times, Mascolo said. Some of the abuse allegedly took place at city-owned firehouses and some were in conjunction with activities for children that were sponsored by the fire department, the suit claimed.
The jury appeared to struggle with the issue of proximate cause, Mascolo said, because a large part of the abuse did not occur at firehouses.
The jury voted 7-1 to find the city and fire department liable.
The city contested liability, arguing that it did not know about any abuse, and that it properly supervised its staff, Mascolo said.
Under the high-low agreement, Guiod was guaranteed a $450,000 recovery, regardless of the jury verdict, and any award exceeding $4.5 million would be capped at that amount.
Fleites pleaded guilty to sexually abusing Guiod and two other victims in 2019, and was sentenced to 10 years in prison, said Mascolo.
In 2020, Fleites was ordered to pay $4.75 million to another abuse victim, who was identified as John Doe in court documents. Fleites did not respond to that suit and was held in default, according to a published account. Guiod did not bring a claim against Fleites.
"We are pleased that the jury found this public entity responsible for a lack of supervision and training that contributed to this horrible story. Hopefully, this verdict reinforces the concept to any organization that it must properly supervise all employees and facilities and train its employees as to risks and signs of child sexual abuse. My client is please to have some form of legal closure in this matter, although the scars will remain with him long after this verdict," Mascolo said.
The suit said the abuse caused Guiod to experience severe emotional and psychological distress, humiliation, fright, dissociation, anger, depression, anxiety, family turmoil, a severe shock to his nervous system, physical pain and mental anguish, and emotional and psychological damage. Some of the injuries he suffered are permanent and lasting in nature and he will be obligated to spend sums of money for treatment, the suit claimed.
The case was brought pursuant to a 2019 revision of the New Jersey Child Sex Abuse Act, which gives victims of sexual assault seven years to pursue civil litigation against the person who harmed them. Survivors of sexual abuse have until age 55 or seven years from the time that they became aware of their trauma to file a civil suit against a responsible party.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHit by Mail Truck: Man Agrees to $1.85M Settlement for Spinal Injuries
Construction Worker Hit by Falling Concrete Settles Claims for $2.3M
4 minute readDoes the FAAAA Preempt State Negligence Claims Against Freight Brokers?
7 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250