Prosecute American Purveyors of Forced Labor
We urge the U.S. Department of Justice to take a close look at what is going on in China and other locales and the complicity of American corporations in those events.
June 25, 2023 at 10:00 AM
7 minute read
18 U.S.C. § 1589 of the Trafficking Victims Protection Act, a new provision of the U.S. anti-slavery law, changed the landscape for criminal investigations and prosecutions of behaviors that for over 150 years, had escaped detection and apprehension by the authorities after the abolition of slavery in 1865. Enacted in 2000, the statute created a new crime under the U.S. criminal code, denominated as "forced labor." "Forced labor" was defined by the statute in 2000 as the obtaining of labor or services by means of threats of serious harm or physical restraint, or by means of the abuse of law or legal process, or threats to engage in such abuse, or by constructing a scheme or plan or pattern that would make the victim believe that he or she would suffer serious harm if he or she did not provide labor or services to the "employer." In 2008, the statute was made tougher, amending the definition of forced labor to criminalize the use of force or threats of the use of force to obtain labor or services. The 2008 amendments also criminalize the knowing receipt of financial benefits and profits from participation in ventures that engage in forced labor. The reach of the statute was extended to allow prosecution for participation in forced labor ventures that occur outside the United States. If a U.S. person, including a domestically organized corporation or a corporation operating in the U.S., receives financial benefits from participation in a forced labor venture, no matter where located, it may be prosecuted in the United States under Section 1589(b) of the criminal provisions of the Trafficking Victims Protection Act. A federal court may impose a penalty of up to 20 years in prison if one is found guilty of financially benefitting from participation in a forced labor venture. Although prosecution of a corporation has its challenges, there are cases, including the recent prosecutions of Arthur Anderson, that show that such prosecutions can be effective, especially when individual executives in the company are also held accountable.
In 2020, Congress and the U.S. Department of Labor found that the Chinese government had created a system of forced labor in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region (XUAR) by requiring mass internment of detainees to work in a number of industries, especially industries involving manufacturing of electronic devices and textiles.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllIncreased Cap on Workers' Comp Attorneys' Fees Benefits All New Jerseyans
7 minute readNJ Court Sides With Real Estate Broker in Dispute Over Employee Classification Under Wage Payment Law
6 minute readGibbons Attorneys File WARN Violations Against Christmas Tree Shops Owners for Short Layoff Notices
3 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Reviewing Judge Merchan's Unconditional Discharge
- 2With New Civil Jury Selection Rule, Litigants Should Carefully Weigh Waiver Risks
- 3Young Lawyers Become Old(er) Lawyers
- 4Caught In the In Between: A Legal Roadmap for the Sandwich Generation
- 5Top 10 Developments, Lessons, and Reminders of 2024
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250