New Jersey Supreme Court Justice Anne M. Patterson. Photo by Carmen Natale/ALM At NJ Supreme Court Arguments, Attorneys Spar Over Scope of Refund Provision in 'Truth in Menu Act'
"As evidenced by the defendants briefing in their oral arguments today, our state legislature clearly intended section 2.11 to apply to a very specific category of consumer frauds, namely specific acts in misnaming or otherwise misleading customers as to the identity of food on restaurant menus," Alex R. Daniel, who argued for amicus curiae New Jersey Civil Justice Institute, said.
September 27, 2023 at 01:46 PM
6 minute read
In oral arguments before the New Jersey Supreme Court on Tuesday, the justices weighed whether the refund provision created under the "Truth in Menu Act" was intended to apply only to violations involving food or to all claims of any kind brought under the Consumer Fraud Act.
A lawsuit, originally brought in 2013, was filed against five retirement communities in New Jersey—Springpoint at Monroe Village, Springpoint at Montgomery, Springpoint at Crestwood, Springpoint at Meadow Lakes and Springpoint at the Atrium.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
'The Tobacco Industry of This Decade': Slew of Class Actions Accuse DraftKings of Creating Addicts
5 minute read
Where CFPB Enforcement Stops Short on Curbing School Lunch Fees, Class Action Complaint Steps Up
5 minute read
NJ Appellate Division Holds 'Clickwrap' Arbitration Provision Enforceable
5 minute read
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Eleven Attorneys General Say No to 'Unconstitutional' Hijacking of State, Local Law Enforcement
- 2Optimizing Legal Services: The Shift Toward Digital Document Centers
- 3Charlie Javice Fraud Trial Delayed as Judge Denies Motion to Sever
- 4Holland & Knight Hires Former Davis Wright Tremaine Managing Partner in Seattle
- 5With DEI Rollbacks, Employment Attorneys See Potential for Targeting Corporate Commitment to Equality
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
