Trial by Jury? Only if You File in Time
"There is a strict time period by which this jury demand must be filed," writes litigation attorney Betsy G. Ramos.
February 22, 2024 at 10:00 AM
6 minute read
Civil AppealsPlaintiff Shree Atulya Realty filed a lawsuit against defendant Jorlinar Santos concerning thepurchase of property from defendant located in Newark. The lawsuit was filed in the Chancery Division, General Equity Part, seeking to discharge a mortgage held by the defendant seller and asserted claims against defendant for breach of contract, unjust enrichment, and fraud. When the case reached the trial stage, after being transferred to the Law Division, one of the issues in Shree Atulya Realty v. Santos, 2024 N.J. Super. Unpub. LEXIS 223 (App. Div. Feb. 14, 2024), was whether defendant failed to timely request a jury trial and, as a result, whether this failure constituted a waiver of the right to a trial by jury.
While actions in which the primary relief sought is equitable in nature are to be filed in the Chancery Division (per Rule 4:3-1), if the complaint seeks both legal and equitable relief, potentially the claims for legal relief could be triable by a jury. Filing a lawsuit in the Chancery Division does not preclude a party from seeking the right to a jury trial. See O'Neill v. Vreeland, 6 N.J. 158, 167-68 (1951); Boardwalk Properties v. BPHC Acquisition, 253 N.J. Super. 515, 526 (App. Div. 1991). Whether the right to a jury trial attaches will depend upon whether the action is primarily legal (subject to a jury trial) or equitable (no right to a jury trial). See Wood v. New Jersey Mfrs. Ins., 206 N.J. 562, 575 (2011).
However, there is a strict time period by which this jury demand must be filed. Pursuant to Rule 4:35-1(a), a demand for a trial by jury must be made "by serving upon the other parties a demand therefor in writing not later than 10 days after the service of the last pleading directed to such issue." This rule further provides that the demand may be appended to the party's pleadings. But, under subsection (c) of this rule, the failure to serve a demand within that time frame "constitutes a waiver of trial by jury."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Point Us to the Plain Language': NJ Supreme Court Grills Defense Statutory Requirements for Affidavit of Merit
5 minute read3rd Circuit Judges Zero In on Constitutional Challenges to Medicare Drug Pricing Program
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250