Proceed With Caution: Shifting Beneficial Interests in a Trust May Trigger Gifts
"The good news is that the CCA was limited to a discreet issue involving a specific trust," writes Daniela P. Catrocho of Day Pitney. The bad news is that "the CCA could theoretically apply to other scenarios."
March 19, 2024 at 11:00 AM
8 minute read
At the end of 2023, the Internal Revenue Service dropped a Chief Counsel Advice Memorandum that has caused a stir in the world of estate and gift tax planning. In CCA 202352018, issued on Dec. 29, 2023 (the CCA), the IRS concluded that the beneficiaries of a grantor trust made a taxable gift to the grantor as a result of a trust modification to add a provision in the trust that would permit the trustee to reimburse the grantor for income taxes attributable to the trust. While taxpayers cannot rely on this CCA as official IRS guidance, it nevertheless outlines the IRS's position on this issue, which could potentially have sweeping implications for the modification, decanting and the administration of irrevocable trusts.
Background
In a given year, the grantor of the trust at issue in the CCA established and funded an irrevocable inter vivos trust for the benefit of the grantor's child and the child's descendants. The trust provided that the trustee can make distributions of income and principal to or for the benefit of the child for any reason. Upon the child's death, the remaining trust property will to be distributed to the child's descendants, per stirpes. The trust was established as a grantor trust, wherein the grantor is the deemed owner of the trust under Internal Revenue Code Section 671. Accordingly, all income, deductions and credits attributable to the trust are included in the grantor's taxable income.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllIdeas We Should Borrow: A Legislative Wishlist for NJ Trusts and Estates
14 minute readNew Methods for Clients and Families to Have Their Estate and Legacy Planning Complete
5 minute readFalling Back in Love With Certain Estate Planning Strategies in a Falling Interest Rate Environment
9 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250