New Jersey's Organized Delivery Systems Law Presents Unique Challenges for Value-Based Care
"In practice, current state law and regulations make it uniquely challenging for health care payers and providers in New Jersey to implement VBC arrangements," writes Michael J. Morris.
April 18, 2024 at 10:00 AM
9 minute read
New Jersey is fortunate to be home to world-class hospitals and integrated health care systems. These institutions are especially keen to remind New Jerseyans of their capacity to provide one-stop shopping for all health care needs, as one is likely to have noticed through prolific advertising during broadcasts of major sporting events, in mass transportation venues, and on billboards along the parkway and turnpike. If nothing else, the tremendous growth of New Jersey's health care systems has facilitated the ability for patients to receive truly clinically integrated health care service, with hospitals and providers across the full spectrum of medical specialties working collaboratively to keep patients healthy.
Yet the trend toward increasing clinical integration and overall patient health care management does not happen in a purely altruistic vacuum. For decades now there has been a public policy push, most often at the federal level, to move health care delivery (especially in the context of Medicare and Medicaid) toward value-based care (VBC) arrangements. In Medicare, following passage of the Affordable Care Act in 2010, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Studies (CMS) implemented the first Accountable Care Organization (ACO) program, in which clinically integrated physician networks assumed responsibility for overall patient health and became financially incentivized to maintain or improve patient health and reduce fee-for-service (FFS) payments due for treatment of attributed Medicare patients. By the end of 2022, over 11 million traditional Medicare patients were under the care of an ACO through the Medicare Shared Savings Program, over 573,000 clinicians across the country participate in an ACO, and CMS is actively striving toward a goal of having 100% traditional Medicare recipients covered by an ACO by 2030.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAmid Criticism of Quality of Care at Hospital, Childbirth Trauma Suit Yields $11.9M
4 minute readJury Awards Horizon $2.4 Million for Fraudulent Billing Against 3 NJ Health Care Providers
2 minute readVirtua Drug Tests Pregnancy Patients Without Consent, NJ Attorney General Alleges in New Suit
3 minute read'I Don't Want to Die Fearfully': Outsiders Can't Get Help to Die in NJ
4 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Public Notices/Calendars
- 2Wednesday Newspaper
- 3Decision of the Day: Qui Tam Relators Do Not Plausibly Claim Firm Avoided Tax Obligations Through Visa Applications, Circuit Finds
- 4Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-116
- 5Big Law Firms Sheppard Mullin, Morgan Lewis and Baker Botts Add Partners in Houston
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250