![](http://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/399/2024/08/AdobeStock_270864386-767x633-1.jpg)
The Mediation You Love to See
"Never forget the old truism, the best resolution by mediation is when both sides walk away unhappy," writes CSG Law's Joseph A. Dickson.
August 20, 2024 at 11:00 AM
7 minute read
Our judicial and trial systems have been designed over the last 250 years to fairly and equitably adjudicate disputes between parties to a disagreement, to eliminate surprise at the time of trial, to ensure a public record of the airing of grievances and provide an avenue of appeal if mistakes are made. Trial by jury is enshrined in our justice system and the laws of our country from the U.S. Bill of Rights, in the Sixth and Seventh Amendments, to Article One, Section 9 of the New Jersey State Constitution; nonetheless, our judicial system is constantly under scrutiny and in the process of improvement through the development of the common law, rules and legislation.
As important and fundamental as the right to trial by jury is, it is generally recognized that mediation is faster and less expensive. Moreover, in New Jersey, whether your dispute is pending in federal or state court, you have a decent chance of getting a mediator you want, or at least trust, due to the large numbers of mediators on the court lists and now advertising their services in the legal press.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![Contracts Game Changer? One-Sided ADR Provision Overturned Contracts Game Changer? One-Sided ADR Provision Overturned](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/1e/a6/8a166de04660b13a6f5e05e5ff4d/alternative-dispute-resolution-767x633.jpg)
![New Jersey’s Arbitration Appeal Deadline—A Call for Clarity New Jersey’s Arbitration Appeal Deadline—A Call for Clarity](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/75/1e/ceef2d4943569673eed89b92d7da/brown-valentin-767x633.jpg)
![Arbitrators Under Fire for Allegedly Forcing Workers to 'Stay or Pay' Employers Arbitrators Under Fire for Allegedly Forcing Workers to 'Stay or Pay' Employers](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/0d/94/4a55003943eba2a761b3eb3ce9cc/aaa-logo-767x633-1.jpg)
Arbitrators Under Fire for Allegedly Forcing Workers to 'Stay or Pay' Employers
5 minute read![Dispute Resolution Boards—Getting Real Time Decisions on Construction Projects Dispute Resolution Boards—Getting Real Time Decisions on Construction Projects](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/96/59/df44f9cf4bf090da36623841e7b9/strong-napierkowski-767x633.jpg)
Dispute Resolution Boards—Getting Real Time Decisions on Construction Projects
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Eliminating Judicial Exceptions: The Promise of the Patent Eligibility Restoration Act
- 2AI in Legal: Disruptive Potential and Practical Realities
- 3One Court’s Opinion on Successfully Bankruptcy Proofing a Borrower
- 4Making the Case for Workflow Automation
- 5Copyright Infringement by Generative AI Tools Under US and UK Law: Common Threads and Contrasting Approaches
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250