Where Does New Jersey's Patient Safety Act Stand After 'Keyworth'?
"The opinion in 'Keyworth' brings to the center the importance of compliance with the PSA and regulations as a prerequisite for the privilege to apply," writes Peter Espey.
August 28, 2024 at 10:00 AM
6 minute read
On Aug. 5, 2024, the New Jersey Supreme Court issued a decision relevant to many medical malpractice cases. Keyworth v. CareOne at Madison Ave., 2024 N.J. LEXIS 791 (Aug. 5, 2024 slip opinion). The court reinstated a trial judge's determination that documents a nursing facility and assisted living facility sought to protect fell outside the scope of the absolute privilege afforded by the Patient Safety Act (PSA). The PSA set up a complex system of analyzing patient safety events and reporting defined serious preventable adverse events that occur to patients. The PSA also created an absolute privilege for information and materials falling within its scope. This article includes analysis of the court's decision, a description of what is clear after this decision, and a brief discussion regarding potential future issues.
Keyworth involved an 80-year-old resident who fell twice on the same day at a skilled nursing facility. The first fall was in the resident's room shortly after midnight and the second was later that morning in front of the nurses' station. The staff entered concise descriptions in the resident's medical records of what occurred regarding each fall. The first fall appeared to involve the resident experiencing some disorientation in her room. The second fall happened when the resident attempted to stand and slid to the floor. The facility created incident reports for each fall. It did not report the falls to the Department of Health (DOH).
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAmid Criticism of Quality of Care at Hospital, Childbirth Trauma Suit Yields $11.9M
4 minute readJury Awards Horizon $2.4 Million for Fraudulent Billing Against 3 NJ Health Care Providers
2 minute readVirtua Drug Tests Pregnancy Patients Without Consent, NJ Attorney General Alleges in New Suit
3 minute read'I Don't Want to Die Fearfully': Outsiders Can't Get Help to Die in NJ
4 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250