Pinelands Commission Water Diversion Regulation Prompts Reaction From Community
"Perhaps Clayton's greatest concern is that the Regulation ... fails to meaningfully exempt non-consumptive diversions," writes Connell Foley's Ryan Benson.
September 17, 2024 at 11:00 AM
3 minute read
A sand mining company recently filed a brief challenging a Pinelands Commission rule that regulates diversions of water from an aquifer in the New Jersey Pinelands. The rule in question, published at 54 N.J.R. 1668(a) (the Regulation), regulates proposed water diversions of 50,000 gallons per day or more from the Kirkwood-Cohansey Aquifer and reduces the quantity of water that may be diverted therefrom. It thus impacts parties that use large amounts of water from the aquifer, including resource extraction operations that mine sand and gravel in the Pinelands, and municipalities.
The case is before the Appellate Division of the New Jersey Superior Court and is captioned In re Challenge of Clayton Sand Company to Dec. 4, 2023 Amendments to N.J.A.C. 7:50-1.1 et seq. (Docket No. A-001476-23). The initial brief was filed on July 30, 2024, on behalf of Clayton Sand Company. It argues that the Regulation, without any legislative authority, encroaches upon the jurisdiction of the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP). As Clayton notes, the Water Supply Management Act directs the NJDEP to "manage the water supply by adopting a uniform water diversion system," and the Appellate Division has previously determined that "NJDEP has the exclusive authority … to manage the water supply … and the diversions of that water supply." United Water N.J. v. Boro. Of Hillsdale, 438 N.J. Super. 309, 319 (App. Div. 2014). Clayton thus seeks invalidation of the Regulation.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNeighboring States Have Either Passed or Proposed Climate Superfund Laws—Is Pennsylvania Next?
7 minute readNJ Manufacturing Company Sues Insurer to Recoup PFAS Remediation Losses
4 minute readNJDEP Proposes Changes to Hazardous Substance Discharge Reporting Rules
7 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Eight Years On, A&O Shearman’s Fuse Legal Tech Incubator is Still Evolving
- 2Google Makes Appeal to Overturn Jury Verdict Branding the Play Store as an Illegal Monopoly
- 3First Amendment Litigator Returns to Gibson Dunn
- 4In Record Year for Baker Botts, Revenue Up 11.8%, PEP Up 17.6%
- 5Loopholes, DNA Collection and Tech: Does Your Consent as a User of a Genealogy Website Override Another Person’s Fourth Amendment Right?
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250