Law Firm Seeks to Recoup Recruiter's Fee From Ex-CFO Who Had Brief Tenure on Job
"Gross has never denied or disputed his aforementioned payment obligation under the employment agreement, but is instead simply refusing to pay it in a demonstration of bad faith conduct," the complaint states.
October 31, 2024 at 02:17 PM
3 minute read
Law Firm ManagementA New Jersey law firm has sued its former chief financial officer, seeking reimbursement of fees it paid to a recruiter when he was hired.
Brandon J. Broderick LLC seeks repayment of $19,432 from Seth Gross, representing the unpaid balance due to a recruiting company called CFO Strategies. The suit, filed in Bergen County Superior Court, says Gross agreed when he was hired in June 2022 to pay off the entire $43,000 fee from CFO Strategies in deductions of $1,653 from his biweekly paycheck.
But "unfortunately, it quickly became clear after his employment commenced that Gross was woefully unable to effectively perform the role as the Broderick Firm's CFO," and he was terminated on Feb. 3, 2023, the suit claims.
Under terms of Gross' employment agreement, the outstanding balance he owed to the Broderick firm for the CFO Strategies fee was due in August 2023, six months after his departure, the suit claims. The firm sent a letter to Gross on July 5, 2023 to remind him of the approaching deadline, and made numerous good faith efforts to collect the money before the deadline, the complaint states. But Gross has "willfully refused" to satisfy his obligation, the suit claims.
"Indeed, Gross has never denied or disputed his aforementioned payment obligation under the employment agreement, but is instead simply refusing to pay it in a demonstration of bad faith conduct," the complaint states.
Jason R. Finkelstein of Cole Schotz in Hackensack, who represents the Broderick firm, declined to discuss the case. Gross did not respond to a reporter's questions sent by email and LinkedIn.
The Broderick firm, in River Edge, which lists 51 attorneys on its website, represents plaintiffs in personal injury, workers compensation, employment law and medical malpractice cases.
The firm paid Gross a "handsome" salary, the suit said, but the amount was not specified. The firm paid the recruiter's fee but then demanded reimbursement from Gross, the suit claims.
Gross "is responsible for reimbursing the firm for the [$]43,000 that the firm pays to CFO Strategies. The payments [Gross] will be responsible for, will be reimbursed back to the firm over [Gross]'s first twelve (12) months of employment," the suit said.
Requiring a newly-hired administrator to agree to pay the recruiter's fee is an unorthodox practice, said Dan Binstock, a legal recruiter at Garrison in Washington, D.C.
"In the recruiting industry, generally, it's very unusual for an employer to make the candidates responsible for paying the recruiter who was engaged by the employer. I don't think I've ever heard of that," Binstock said.
This suit was surfaced by Law.com Radar, ALM's source for immediate alerting on just filed cases in state and federal courts. Law.com Radar now offers state court coverage nationwide. Click here to sign up today and be first to know about new suits in your region, practice area or client sector.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllManaging Partners Survey: Please Let Us Know How The Past Year Went
Law Firms Sue Clients for Unpaid Legal Fees as Big Law Collection Goals Ramp Up
Wave of Office Closures Highlights the Weighty Stakes Surrounding Law Firm Growth
7 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Mass. Judge Declares Mistrial in Talc Trial: 'Court Can't Accommodate This Case'
- 3Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
- 4It's Time Law Firms Were Upfront About Who Their Salaried Partners Are
- 5Greenberg Traurig Initiates String of Suits Following JPMorgan Chase's 'Infinite Money Glitch'
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250