Law Firm Seeks to Recoup Recruiter's Fee From Ex-CFO Who Had Brief Tenure on Job
"Gross has never denied or disputed his aforementioned payment obligation under the employment agreement, but is instead simply refusing to pay it in a demonstration of bad faith conduct," the complaint states.
October 31, 2024 at 02:17 PM
3 minute read
A New Jersey law firm has sued its former chief financial officer, seeking reimbursement of fees it paid to a recruiter when he was hired.
Brandon J. Broderick LLC seeks repayment of $19,432 from Seth Gross, representing the unpaid balance due to a recruiting company called CFO Strategies. The suit, filed in Bergen County Superior Court, says Gross agreed when he was hired in June 2022 to pay off the entire $43,000 fee from CFO Strategies in deductions of $1,653 from his biweekly paycheck.
But "unfortunately, it quickly became clear after his employment commenced that Gross was woefully unable to effectively perform the role as the Broderick Firm's CFO," and he was terminated on Feb. 3, 2023, the suit claims.
Under terms of Gross' employment agreement, the outstanding balance he owed to the Broderick firm for the CFO Strategies fee was due in August 2023, six months after his departure, the suit claims. The firm sent a letter to Gross on July 5, 2023 to remind him of the approaching deadline, and made numerous good faith efforts to collect the money before the deadline, the complaint states. But Gross has "willfully refused" to satisfy his obligation, the suit claims.
"Indeed, Gross has never denied or disputed his aforementioned payment obligation under the employment agreement, but is instead simply refusing to pay it in a demonstration of bad faith conduct," the complaint states.
Jason R. Finkelstein of Cole Schotz in Hackensack, who represents the Broderick firm, declined to discuss the case. Gross did not respond to a reporter's questions sent by email and LinkedIn.
The Broderick firm, in River Edge, which lists 51 attorneys on its website, represents plaintiffs in personal injury, workers compensation, employment law and medical malpractice cases.
The firm paid Gross a "handsome" salary, the suit said, but the amount was not specified. The firm paid the recruiter's fee but then demanded reimbursement from Gross, the suit claims.
Gross "is responsible for reimbursing the firm for the [$]43,000 that the firm pays to CFO Strategies. The payments [Gross] will be responsible for, will be reimbursed back to the firm over [Gross]'s first twelve (12) months of employment," the suit said.
Requiring a newly-hired administrator to agree to pay the recruiter's fee is an unorthodox practice, said Dan Binstock, a legal recruiter at Garrison in Washington, D.C.
"In the recruiting industry, generally, it's very unusual for an employer to make the candidates responsible for paying the recruiter who was engaged by the employer. I don't think I've ever heard of that," Binstock said.
This suit was surfaced by Law.com Radar, ALM's source for immediate alerting on just filed cases in state and federal courts. Law.com Radar now offers state court coverage nationwide. Click here to sign up today and be first to know about new suits in your region, practice area or client sector.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSmaller Firms in 'Growth Mode' as Competition, Rates Heat Up
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Two Wilkinson Stekloff Associates Among Victims of DC Plane Crash
- 2Two More Victims Alleged in New Sean Combs Sex Trafficking Indictment
- 3Jackson Lewis Leaders Discuss Firm's Innovation Efforts, From Prompt-a-Thons to Gen AI Pilots
- 4Trump's DOJ Files Lawsuit Seeking to Block $14B Tech Merger
- 5'No Retributive Actions,' Kash Patel Pledges if Confirmed to FBI
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250