Essex County Jury Returns $1.8 Million Verdict for Construction Site Fall
An Essex County jury returned a $1.8 million verdict following a seven-day trial in a personal injury claim over a fall down the stairs at a construction site.
November 13, 2024 at 02:41 PM
3 minute read
Personal InjuryAn Essex County jury returned a $1.8 million verdict following a seven-day trial in a personal injury claim over a fall down the stairs at a construction site.
Anderson Rodrigues Guerini was working for Warrenville Plumbing on a commercial construction site in Union City, where he was transporting a bathtub upstairs on Jan. 17, 2018. Guerini lost his footing on a temporary staircase in a section where the guardrails had been removed. He sustained severe back injuries in the fall.
Guerini underwent a two-level decompression, interbody fusion, and segmental pedicle screw fixation in his lumber spine, as well as an anterior cervical discectomy with fixation and fusion. According to his attorney, John Ratkowitz of Ginarte Gonzalez & Winograd in Newark, Guerini recovered from the cervical surgery but continues to experience significant limitations to his lower back, which restricts his ability to work and perform daily activities. The defendants claimed the cervical spine injury was unrelated to the accident, according to Ratkowitz.
Guerini filed suit in Guerini v. Hutchgrove Enterprises in Essex County Superior Court in September 2018 against Hutchgrove Enterprises, the project developer, and Vin Rick Builders, the general contractor. The suit alleges that both entities failed to provide a safe workplace. Vin Rick argued that it had ceased involvement in the project 10 months before the accident.
Guerini alleged that Hutchgrove failed to implement and manage a safety program at the job site, contributing to the accident. He further alleged that Vin Rick, as the general contractor, was also negligent in managing safety at the job site.
Judge Annette Scoca presided over the trial, which finished ahead of schedule, according to Ratkowitz.
The seven-member jury returned a verdict on Oct. 28, finding that Hutchgrove was negligent in its role as developer and general contractor at the time of the accident. However, the jury found that Vin Rick was not acting as the general contractor at the time of the accident.
The plaintiffs presented a safety expert, Cheryl Scanlon, and a medical expert, Dr. Paul K. Ratzker. Vin Rick presented a safety expert, Robert J. Sagendorf, and Dr. Steven G. Robbins, a medical expert.
The $1.8 million verdict will be reduced by 5% due to the jury’s finding of comparative negligence, according to Ratkowitz. Hutchgrove was attributed 95% liability while Geurini was attributed 5%. That reduced the total verdict to more than $1.7 million. The parties stipulated to an additional $177,161.40 in medical expenses, which brought the net verdict to $1,887,303.33.
Ratkowitz said the jury deliberated for about an hour before reaching its decision.
"The case went to verdict several days ahead of schedule because of how efficiently Judge Scoca and her staff managed the trial and worked after hours on tasks like preparing the final jury charge," Ratkowitz added.
Vin Rick was represented by Christopher J. Hoare of Capehart & Scatchard in Mount Laurel.
"The Honorable Annette Scoca and her court staff were a joy to appear before and managed the trial efficiently and justly," Hoare said in a statement sent to the Law Journal. "The quality of the juror pool was impressive during the two-week trial. Our client was very satisfied with the outcome."
Hutchgrove was represented by Andrew E. Ingram Jr., a solo practitioner in Scotch Plains, who declined to comment.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDoes the FAAAA Preempt State Negligence Claims Against Freight Brokers?
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Free Speech Causes a Neighborly Feud
- 2Read the Document: 'Google Must Divest Chrome,' DOJ Says, Proposing Remedies in Search Monopoly Case
- 3Voir Dire Voyeur: I Find Out What Kind of Juror I’d Be
- 4When It Comes to Local Law 97 Compliance, You’ve Gotta Have (Good) Faith
- 5Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Virginia Griffith, Director of Business Development at OutsideGC
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250