As Trafficking, Hate Crimes Rise in NJ, State's Federal Delegation Must Weigh in On New UN Proposal
We urge that attention be paid so that positions taken by the United States on this ground-breaking convention reflect informed commentary by New Jersey.
December 13, 2024 at 12:43 PM
4 minute read
On Nov. 22, the Sixth Committee of the United Nations General Assembly approved without vote the draft text of the “United Nations Conference of Plenipotentiaries on Prevention and Punishment of Crimes against Humanity.” The Sixth Committee is charged with considering legal issues that come before the General Assembly; the United States as a member state of the United Nations is entitled to representation on this committee. The Crimes Against Humanity Convention is based on the work of the International Law Commission, which was established in 1947 by the General Assembly to essentially develop and codify international law, much as “uniform law commissions” seek to do domestically. The proposed treaty now moves forward with a negotiation process among states beginning in 2026, with a three week UN conference on the convention to occur in 2028 and 2029. Remarks made in October 2024 by the United States applauded the draft convention articles as “an important step forward” in filling the gap for accountability since, unlike the cases of genocide, war crimes, torture, enforced disappearances and apartheid, there is no multilateral treaty on crimes against humanity. The proposed convention addresses attacks on civilians not just in war zones, but in peacetime as well, and sets out a mandatory framework for nations to address the defined crimes against humanity in national courts.
The draft convention purports to define ten such “crimes against humanity” as murder, extermination, enslavement, deportation/forceable transfer of people, imprisonment/severe deprivation of physical liberty in violation of international law, torture, rape and related issues of sexual slavery, persecution against identifiable groups based on political, racial, national, ethnic, cultural, religious, gender or other universally recognized grounds, enforced disappearance of people, apartheid and a catchall for “other inhumane acts of a similar character.” The convention would impose on nations an undertaking to not commit the defined acts through national legislation and international cooperation, and essentially criminalize the acts under national law, with concomitant establishment of measures to establish its jurisdiction in covered cases. Other features address investigation, interim relief, due process and other practical concerns.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSome Think New Jersey Could Be a Hub for International Dispute Resolution
4 minute readMust the Government Ensure Defendants Equal Access to Overseas Evidence?
9 minute readMerck Faces $300M Breach-of-Contract Suit Over Manufacturing Agreement in India
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'It's Not Going to Be Pretty': PayPal, Capital One Face Novel Class Actions Over 'Poaching' Commissions Owed Influencers
- 211th Circuit Rejects Trump's Emergency Request as DOJ Prepares to Release Special Counsel's Final Report
- 3Supreme Court Takes Up Challenge to ACA Task Force
- 4'Tragedy of Unspeakable Proportions:' Could Edison, DWP, Face Lawsuits Over LA Wildfires?
- 5Meta Pulls Plug on DEI Programs
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250