Samsung Research America building campus in Mountain View, California. SRA is a research and develop division for new technologies of Samsung.Credit: bennymarty/Adobe StockHow We Won: Samsung Defeats Data Breach Class Action
Not all data is created equal, and the information stolen in this case is "too mundane" or readily available online to significantly increase an individual's risk of identity theft, the judge said.
January 06, 2025 at 04:47 PM
5 minute read
What You Need to Know
- Federal judge dismisses an MDL brought on behalf of individuals whose personal information was stolen in a Samsung data breach.
- Four of the 41 plaintiffs say their data landed on the dark web, but they did not allege that data stolen in this incident, as opposed to data obtained elsewhere, is on the dark web.
- Information obtained in this incident is not the type of personal identifying information that subjects an individual to a heightened risk of identity theft or fraud.
As lawsuits fly over compromised information, a group of lawyers secured a dismissal for a high-profile client on the hot seat.
They won before a federal judge in Camden, New Jersey, who dismissed a data breach class action against Samsung Electronics America, finding the court has no jurisdiction over the case.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
Related Stories
View AllYou Might Like
View All
Amazon's Audible Hit With Privacy Class Action Over Use of Tracking Pixels
In a First, a Geolocation Privacy Class Action Will Go to a Jury
New Jersey Adds New Roads to an Already Complicated Privacy Map
New Jersey Data Privacy Law Reinforces Certain Trends, Carves Out New Burdens
Trending Stories
- 1African Law Firm Investigated Over ‘AI-Generated’ Case References
- 2Gen AI and Associate Legal Writing: Davis Wright Tremaine's New Training Model
- 3Departing Attorneys Sue Their Former Law Firm
- 4Pa. High Court: Concrete Proof Not Needed to Weigh Grounds for Preliminary Injunction Order
- 5'Something Else Is Coming': DOGE Established, but With Limited Scope
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
