How a C-Section 'Scheduling Error' Led to a $17M Settlement
"I was steadfast in my argument that, as complex as the medicine surrounding placenta accreta spectrum may be, this case really boiled down to a scheduling error," Daryl L. Zaslow of Eichen Crutchlow Zaslow said.
January 07, 2025 at 01:02 PM
3 minute read
A $17 million settlement has been reached for a girl injured at birth when she was deprived of oxygen.
The case, Doucette v. Al-Khan, M.D., was filed in Ocean County Superior Court in October 2021. Daryl L. Zaslow of Eichen Crutchlow Zaslow obtained the award on behalf of Shea Doucette, now 4 years old, who suffers hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy and cerebral palsy allegedly as a result of a birth injury. Zaslow told the Law Journal that a portion of the settlement will be used to purchase annuities, which guarantee payments of more than $18 million but are anticipated to pay over $28 million. The total settlement will ultimately be worth between $26.9 to $37.1 million, Zaslow said.
“Although this case was vociferously disputed on the issue of liability, everyone involved was acutely aware of the devastating damages sustained by Shea, her parents, and to Shea’s entire family,” Zaslow said.
Shea’s mother Jenna Doucette was 32 years old when she became pregnant in 2019. During her prenatal care, she was diagnosed with placenta percreta, a form of placenta accreta spectrum where the placenta grows too deeply into the uterine wall making it difficult to separate at birth, according to Zaslow. She sought treatment from Dr. Abdulla Al-Khan, a maternal-fetal medicine specialist at The Center for Abnormal Placentation at Hackensack University Medical Center, according to the complaint.
The complaint said that on March 8, 2020, Doucette suffered a massive uterine rupture and placenta abruption and then underwent an emergency cesarean section. According to the complaint, as a result, Doucette's daughter was deprived of oxygen at birth, suffered hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy and was diagnosed with cerebral palsy. Jenna also required multiple blood transfusions and was admitted to the intensive care unit for placental abruption and massive abdominal bleeding, the complaint said.
Jenna was scheduled for a cesarean section on March 11, when she would have been 37 weeks pregnant, but Zaslow said the high-risk condition his client suffered from indicates that she should have had a cesarean section between 34 and 36 weeks of gestation.
Zaslow said the defense argued that a stable patient with this condition without placenta previa could be delivered at 37 weeks. According to court documents, the defense also argued that Doucette’s right to recovery was barred by the doctrine of assumption of the risk and that the defendants' treatment was within the accepted standards of care.
Zaslow said he consulted 22 experts in the case and served 15 expert reports.
“Although the numerous experts were necessary, throughout the litigation, I argued that this case was unlike most traditional birth injury cases that involve extraordinarily complex medical issues, including the interpretation of fetal heart rate tracings, infection, neuroradiology and genetics," Zaslow said. "I was steadfast in my argument that, as complex as the medicine surrounding placenta accreta spectrum may be, this case really boiled down to a scheduling error.”
The settlement was reached following three days of mediation over five months before retired Superior Court Judge Joseph P. Quinn. Superior Court Judge James Den Uyl presided over the case and approved the $17 million settlement on Jan. 3. Zaslow said the settlement is being paid entirely on behalf of Al-Khan.
Zaslow was assisted in the litigation by his partner, Frances Wang Deveney.
William J. Buckley of Schenck Price Smith & King represented Al-Khan, The Center for Abnormal Placentation at Hackensack University Medical Center, and Hackensack Meridian Health. He did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
A second doctor named in the complaint, Dr. Jesus Rafael Alvarez-Perez, was represented by Robert T. Evers of Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin. Evers did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All$2.85 Million Settlement Reached for Pedestrian Killed by Clifton Police Department Car
2 minute read'Go 12 Rounds' or Settle: Rear-End Collision Leads to $2.25M Presuit Settlement
Trending Stories
- 1Special Series Part 3: The Statutory Guardrails Violate the Majority Vote Rule
- 2Fed Judiciary Panel Mulls Authority to Ban In-State Bar Admission Requirements
- 3Why Georgia's Latest Push to Curb Lawsuits Has Business Groups and Trial Lawyers at Odds
- 4'Another Broken Promise': California Tribes Sue Casinos for Allegedly Illegal Profit From Card Games
- 5Trump Asks U.S. Supreme Court to Halt Sentencing
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250