Bus Company Pays $5 Million in Death of Disabled Child
Fajr Williams, 6, was being transported on bus operated by Montauk Transit of Hillsborough to a summer school program on July 17, 2023, when a strap on her wheelchair allegedly caused her to suffocate.
January 14, 2025 at 03:46 PM
3 minute read
What You Need to Know
- School bus operator agrees presuit to $5 million settlement of claims stemming from death of disabled child.
- Lawyers for parents and estate claimed disabled girl, 6, died because attendant failed to notice that harness was blocking her airway.
- Settlement of $5 million represents full extent of bus company's insurance coverage.
A school bus company has agreed to pay $5 million to the family of a child with disabilities who died after a school bus attendant allegedly failed to notice the girl was suffocating.
Fajr Williams, 6, was being transported on a bus operated by Montauk Transit of Hillsborough to a summer school program on July 17, 2023, when a strap on her wheelchair allegedly caused her to suffocate. On entering the vehicle, the child's wheelchair was secured in the rear by bus monitor Amanda Davila. During the half-hour ride, a series of bumps caused the child to slump in her wheelchair, making the 4-point harness that held her in place to become tight around her neck, according to an investigative report by the Somerset County Prosecutor's Office.
When the bus reached its destination in Franklin Township, the child was unresponsive, and CPR was administered, the prosecutor's office report said. She was taken to a hospital where she was pronounced dead a short time later, the prosecutor's office said. During the trip, Davila, the monitor, was seated toward the front of the bus, using her phone and wearing earbuds in both ears, in violation of company policy, the prosecutor's office said.
The child's parents, Wali Williams and Najmah Nash, who are divorced, and the child's estate brought claims against Montauk Transit. The case was settled presuit for $5 million in November 2024, with Williams and Nash each receiving half.
Da Costa credits the defense for not falling into the common practice in personal injury litigation of discounting a recovery when the injured party is a disabled child.
"Despite the little girl being significantly physically and mentally disabled, we feel that the $5 million settlement is a good and fair result, all things considered. We were happy that there were no discounts given just because the little girl was a disabled child. And I think the $5 million settlement reflects that. Disabled children and adults should have their pain and suffering valued equally, " da Costa said.
"I think there are attempts at times by some defense attorneys and some insurance companies to try and leverage the fact that a child is disabled and therefore may have a limited life expectancy, may not have the ability to live as full of a day-to-day life in their minds as an able-bodied child. But you know, to their credit, the defense in this case was willing to not engage in those types of tactics," da Costa said.
David Osterman of Goldberg Segalla in Princeton represented Montauk Transit. He did not respond to requests for comment about the settlement.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSeton Hall Escapes COVID-19 Wrongful Death Suit After Student Found Dead in Dorm
4 minute read$2.85 Million Settlement Reached for Pedestrian Killed by Clifton Police Department Car
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Court Rejects San Francisco's Challenge to Robotaxi Licenses
- 2'Be Prepared and Practice': Paul Hastings' Michelle Reed Breaks Down Firm's First SEC Cybersecurity Incident Disclosure Report
- 3Lina Khan Gives Up the Gavel After Contentious 4 Years as FTC Chair
- 4Allstate Is Using Cell Phone Data to Raise Prices, Attorney General Claims
- 5Epiq Announces AI Discovery Assistant, Initially Developed by Laer AI, With Help From Sullivan & Cromwell
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250