The state Supreme Court on Tuesday tried to get a handle on whether an investigator’s racial epithet played a role in the prosecution of former New Jersey Nets player Jayson Williams for reckless manslaughter, and whether it has any bearing on his upcoming retrial.
The hearing in State v. Williams , A-56-08, arose from the state’s appeal of an Appellate Division ruling that said defense lawyers could pore through redacted documents for evidence of a racial motive in the prosecution.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
