The limited personal injury benefits under “dollar-a-day” auto policies are not the equivalent of having no benefits for purposes of recourse to the Unsatisfied Claim and Judgment Fund, the Supreme Court held Monday.
The unanimous decision in Sanders v. Langemeier, A-49, overturned two lower rulings that would have allowed recovery from the UCJF by an uninsured passenger in a car whose driver was covered by a dollar-a-day policy, also known as a special policy.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
