The New Jersey Supreme Court’s approval of the state’s new drunken-driving meter has apparently left some drivers in the lurch. An appeals panel on Wednesday held that a stricture that was a condition for the Court’s imprimatur won’t apply retroactively.
In State v. Pollock, A5958-07, the Appellate Division said that the Court’s requirement that Alcotest machines undergo semi-annual recalibrations, doesn’t apply to drivers convicted prior to State v. Chun, 194 N.J. 54 (March 17, 2008), but whose sentencings had been put on hold pending the outcome.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
