Aetna was within its discretion to conclude that the applicant failed to satisfy the applicable definition of disability, and terminate her LTD benefits where she asserted only subjective complaints and four independent reviewers concurred that she was capable of sedentary work.
September 03, 2009 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
Kao v. Aetna Life Insurance Company, No. 08-2824; U.S. District Court (DNJ); opinion by Irenas, S.U.S.D.J.; filed August 25, 2009. DDS No. 25-7-5175 [53 pp.]
In this ERISA action, plaintiff Shao-Hui T. Kao seeks disability benefits under her long-term disability (LTD) benefits plan, which is funded by defendant Towers Perrin Forster & Crosby Inc. Defendant Aetna Life Insurance Company is the LTD claims administrator.
Presented by BigVoodoo
New Jersey Law Journal honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in New Jersey with their dedication to the profession.
GlobeSt. Women of Influence Conference celebrates the women who drive the commercial real estate industry forward.
The New York Law Journal honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in New York.
Reports to: Executive Director FLSA Status: Exempt, Full Time Supervisory Responsibility: N/A Location: Remote Compensation Range: $21...
Berchem Moses PC, a prominent Connecticut law firm with offices in Milford and Westport, is actively recruiting candidates for the following...
McCarter & English, LLP is actively seeking a midlevel associate for its business litigation practice group in its Wilmington, Delaware ...
