Plaintiffs' claims that defendant-banks and law firm collected fees not authorized by their mortgage loan documents and overcharged defaulting borrowers are dismissed.
September 10, 2009 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
Perkins v. Washington Mutual, FSB, No. 09-024; U.S. District Court (DNJ); opinion by Irenas, S.U.S.D.J.; filed September 4, 2009. DDS No. 06-7-5268 [20 pp.]
Plaintiffs Michael and Stacy Perkins assert that defendants Aurora Loan Services, Washington Mutual Bank (WaMu), Wells Fargo Home Mortgage and the law firm of Shapiro & Diaz charged and collected various fees not authorized by mortgage loan documents or applicable law and overcharged them after they defaulted on their residential mortgages.
Presented by BigVoodoo
New Jersey Law Journal honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in New Jersey with their dedication to the profession.
The National Law Journal honors attorneys & judges who've made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in the D.C. area.
This event shines a spotlight on the individuals, teams, projects and organizations that are changing the financial industry.
With bold growth in recent years, Fox Rothschild brings together 1,000 attorneys coast to coast. We offer the reach and resources of a natio...
About Us:Monjur.com is a leading provider of contracts-as-a-service for managed service providers, offering tailored solutions to streamline...
Dynamic Boutique law firm with offices in NYC, Westchester County and Dutchess County, is seeking a mid level litigation associate to work ...
