Videotaped testimony — that vaunted panacea for the logistical problems of producing witnesses when and where needed — has serious limitations in criminal cases, as a Passaic County prosecutor learned the hard way.
A state appeals court on Tuesday overturned a weapons conviction that was largely based on a videotaped deposition of a material witness who had left the country before the trial.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
