Convicting a homeowner of running an illegal boarding house requires a close examination of whether or not the the residents are carrying on “a family style of living,” the Appellate Division ruled Tuesday.
The appeals court, in State v. Attavane , A-2139-08, held that a homeowner’s admission that friends were staying with her and helping her pay her bills did not turn the household into a profit-making venture.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
