However inexcusable a car dealer’s failure to notify a vendor early on that it was fighting a class-action suit in which the vendor might by implicated, it was not so prejudicial as to warrant dismissal of the third-party claims, a state appeals court held on Tuesday.
The ruling, in Kent Motor Cars Inc. v. Reynolds and Reynolds , A-5246-07, overturned a trial court’s dismissal of the dealer’s claims against a printing company, which sold it forms that allegedly did not comply with consumer protection statutes and regulations.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
