The statutory-appeal dismissal sanction of N.J.S.A. 54:4-34 does not violate the Excessive Fines Clause of the Eighth Amendment or the New Jersey Constitution.
March 18, 2010 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
Davanne Realty v. Edison Township, A-25 September Term 2009; Supreme Court; per curiam opinion; decided March 17, 2010. On certification to the Appellate Division, 408 N.J. Super. 16 (App. Div. 2009). [Sat below: Judges Skillman, Graves and Grall in the Appellate Division.] DDS No. 35-1-7173 [5 pp.]
[Note: This is a companion case to Lucent Technologies v. Township of Berkeley Heights and 1717 Realty Associates v. Borough of Fair Lawn , also decided today.]
Presented by BigVoodoo
New Jersey Law Journal honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in New Jersey with their dedication to the profession.
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
DEPUTY PORT ATTORNEY III Oakland, CA Salary: $17,294 - $21,419/month, 37.5-hr work week Your Port. Your Community. Your Career. Whe...
Stern, Lavinthal & Frankenberg, LLC, is seeking a foreclosure attorney experienced in the NJ and/or NY foreclosure process and default l...
Mineola defense firm seeks attorneys with 3-5 years of actual insurance defense experience to handle complex general liability matters. Sala...
