The Appellate Division rendered a decision on Feb. 16 that made me proud to have been a part of the New Jersey judiciary.
When we ascend the bench, we swear to be fair and impartial and to render justice to the best of our ability. As such, we try, within the boundaries of the law, to render decisions that uphold and enforce litigants’ intentions and desires. It is especially gratifying to do so when a litigant’s desire constitutes his final plans. That’s precisely what the court did in Hiller v. Washington Cemetery and Bert Gottesman , A-2510-08.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
