STATE COURT CASES
 
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW — HEALTH

01-2-7675 K.H.M. v. State Health Benefits Commission, App. Div. (per curiam) (16 pp.) Defendant’s decision finding that K.M.H., a state employee, is not entitled to reimbursement under the State Health Benefits Program for costs incurred by her son at a private therapeutic boarding school for his psychological and substance abuse problems is affirmed since the commission’s decision is based on an accurate construction of the contract as embodied in the Member’s Handbook, which is deemed controlling, and neither estoppel nor the application of equitable principles compels a different result on the facts here.

 
ENVIRONMENT — UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS