In February, the New Jersey Supreme Court fundamentally and unconstitutionally expanded the jurisdiction of state courts over foreign defendants or it simply confirmed longstanding precedent. It depends on whom you believe.
Justice Roberto A. Rivera-Soto wrote in his dissent that Nicastro v. McIntyre Machinery, Ltd. is ripe for U.S. Supreme Court review because New Jersey “has decided an important federal question in a way that conflicts with” settled federal constitutional principles.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
