Against a backdrop of conflicting trial court rulings, a New Jersey appeals court is poised to decide whether the state’s year-old statutory ban on oral palimony agreements is retroactive.
On Dec. 13, the Appellate Division will hear arguments in a dispute over a revision to the statute of frauds, N.J.S.A. 25:1-5(h), that requires an agreement by one person to provide support to another during or after a “non-marital personal relationship” be put in writing after both parties are advised by counsel.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
