A former commodities trader seeking a reduction in alimony payments may have been shortchanged on his assertion that technology rendered his job obsolete, a New Jersey appeals court ruled Tuesday.
Finding the record below inadequate, the Appellate Division remanded for “findings and analysis necessary to enable this court to conduct meaningful appellate review” of the judge’s decision that the plaintiff failed to shoulder his burden of demonstrating a change in financial circumstances warranting a permanent modification of support.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
