The law of wills never fails to offer new lessons on how to balance the often-opposite forces of testator intent and statutory execution requirements.
Case in point: an appeals court’s toppling of a Burlington County judge’s rejection of a purported will revision that didn’t meet the statute, even though it made specific bequests that the original will had telegraphed were coming.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
