Although significantly less utilized than emergent applications to a court, seeking temporary restraints or preliminary injunctive relief in arbitration can, in some instances, best serve a client’s interests.

Consider, for example, a business that requires its employees or independent contractors to sign a contract with a noncompetition clause. Clients who conduct business throughout the country face a challenging legal terrain when it comes to enforcing these restrictive covenants. Because this is a state law issue, a business might encounter inconsistent court treatment from state to state. This creates potential legal uncertainty. To try to avoid or lessen the effect of differing state law, many companies utilize a binding arbitration clause in their contracts.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]