A tax court judge has slapped the wrist of a prominent tax-appeal defense lawyer for demanding too much in discovery and for resorting to motions instead of talking to his adversary.
In a Sept. 16 opinion, Judge Gail Menyuk in Trenton said Martin Allen — whose firm represents more than a score of municipalities in tax appeals — “has a practice of demanding answers that go beyond what is asked for by the standard interrogatories” and “refusing to accept answers to interrogatories that have been adequately answered.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
