Consternation over the effect of this year’s pension system overhaul on the state judiciary has prompted a pair of proposed constitutional amendments — one that would be to judges’ liking, the other not so much.
One measure, supported by Gov. Chris Christie, would undo a court ruling that state judges can’t be made to contribute more toward their pension and health-care plans. A second would ease up on a constitutional prohibition on judges earning outside revenue.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]