TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. RULE AMENDMENTS RECOMMENDED FOR ADOPTION
A. Proposed Amendment to R. 1:13-7(d) — New Summons and Service Fee Required With Motion to Restore More Than One Year After Dismissal
B. Proposed Amendment to R. 4:59-1(g) — When to Mail Notice to Debtor
C. Proposed Amendments to R. 6:1-1(e) — Accounting and Security for Civil Part Writs Issued By Order to Special Civil Part Officers
D. Proposed Amendment to R. 6:1-2(a) — Exclusion of Professional Malpractice and Certain Other Actions From the Special Civil Part
E. Proposed Amendment to R. 6:2-3(d)(2) — Request By Pro Se Litigant for Reservice
F. Proposed Amendment to R. 6:3-2 — Caption and Complaint in Assigned Claims
G. Proposed Amendment to R. 6:4-1(g) — Transfers to Chancery Division
H. Proposed Amendment to R. 6:4-5 — Time for Completion of Discovery Proceedings In Actions Cognizable But Not Pending Small Claims Section
I. Proposed Amendment to R. 6:6-3 — Default Judgment on Assigned Claims
J. Proposed Amendment to Rules 6:7-3(b) and 6:7-4(c) — Requesting Additional Post Judgment Interest
K. Proposed Amendment to R. 6:12-1(b) — Clarify Reference to Law Division
L. Proposed Amendment to R. 6:12-2 — Delete Reference to Branch Parts
M. Proposed Amendment to R. 6:12-3(a) — Delete Reference to the County and Municipalities Regarding the Court Officer’s Bond
N. Proposed Amendment to Appendix VI — Notice to Debtor
O. Proposed Amendments to Appendices XI-A(1) and XI-A(2) — Summons and Return of Service
P. Proposed Amendments to Appendices XI-C and XI-D — Indication on Small Claims Complaints of Need For Interpreter or Disability Accommodation; Redaction of Confidential Personal Identifiers
Q. Proposed Amendments to Appendices XI-E and XI-F – Indication on Special Civil Answers of Need For Interpreter or Disability Accommodation; Redaction of Confidential Personal Identifiers; Demand for Jury Trial
II. RULE AMENDMENTS CONSIDERED AND REJECTED
A. Proposed Amendments to R. 6:1-2 — Monetary Limits Increase
B. Proposed Amendment to R. 6:6-3(a) — Requiring the Assignment to be Attached to the Affidavit of Proof When Applying for the Entry of Judgment By Default on Assigned Claims
C. Proposed Amendment to R. 6:6-3(d) — Add Requirement of Good Cause for Delay in Requesting Entry of Judgment More Than 6 Months After Default
D. Proposed Amendments to Rules 6:7-1(c) and 4:59-1(g) – Require Bank to Notify Court Officer and Creditor If Targeted Funds Are Exempt From Levy and to Serve Debtor With Copy of Writ and Notice to Debtor
E. Proposed Amendment to R. 6:7-2(b)(2) — Elimination of Requirement that Creditor First Serve Information Subpoena on Debtor Before Serving Information Subpoena on Bank
III. OTHER RECOMMENDATIONS — NONE
IV. LEGISLATION — NONE
V. MATTERS HELD FOR CONSIDERATION
A. Use of Credit Cards to Pay Fees and Post Deposits
B. Proposed Amendment to R. 6:3-4 – Ejectment Actions in the Special Civil Part
C. Proposed Amendment to R. 6:4-1(d) – Eliminate Certain Copying Fees and Clarify Amount to Be Paid Upon Transfer to Civil Part or General Equity Part
D. Proposed Amendment to Rules 6:6-6 or 6:7-4 — Relief From Bank Fees When Exempt Funds Are Released From Levy
E. Proposed Amendment to R. 6:7-2 — Service of Arrest Warrants in Another County
VI. CONCLUSION
I. RULE AMENDMENTS RECOMMENDED FOR ADOPTION
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
