In Bull v. United Parcel Serv., 665 F.3d 68 (3d Cir. Jan. 4, 2012), the Third Circuit addressed the issue of when a party’s failure to produce a document may constitute spoliation of evidence. The court clarified that, prior to imposing sanctions, a court must engage in a two-part analysis. First, it must determine whether spoliation has occurred. To make such a finding, a court must establish that the party acted in bad faith. Upon demonstrating that spoliation has occurred, a court may move to the second part of the analysis, which is to determine the appropriate sanction to impose.
The requirement that, as a prerequisite to a finding of spoliation, a party demonstrate bad faith is likely the most significant part of the Bull holding. District courts within the Third Circuit had previously split regarding “the requisite culpability of a purported spoliator.” Swindell Dressler Int’l Co. v. Travelers Cas. & Sur. Co., Civil Action No. 10-1150, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 125679 (W.D. Pa. Oct. 31, 2011). In Bull, the Third Circuit clarified that acourt must find that the “purported spoliator” acted in bad faith.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
