The New Jersey Supreme Court took a rare mulligan Monday after finding that its recent ruling on punitive damages in defamation cases was at loggerheads with a state statute.

The court, without comment, corrected the opinion it had issued five days earlier in W.J.A. v. D.A., A-77-10, in which it held that plaintiffs could pursue defamation claims without having to prove actual harm to their reputations.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]