A New Jersey attorney is suing a Supreme Court panel over a ban on attorneys’ ads that quote judges’ favorable comments about them, claiming it violates the First and Fourteenth Amendments.
Andrew Dwyer alleges in his May 30 suit in federal court in Newark that the Committee on Attorney Advertising restricts commercial speech without showing the ban is the least-restrictive means to achieve a substantial state interest.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
