In condemnation actions involving contaminated properties, a portion of the condemnation funds do not have to be set aside for possible remediation, a New Jersey appeals court says.
The decision on Monday in Paulsboro v. Essex Chemical Corp., A-5248-10, is a clarification of the rule established by the state Supreme Court in Housing Authority of the City of New Brunswick v. Suydam Investors, 177 N.J. 2 (2003).
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
