Settled cases may soon outnumber unresolved cases in the long litigation over health insurers’ use of an industry database that set “usual, customary, and reasonable” (UCR) rates for medical procedures. On Dec. 7, Aetna Inc. agreed to a $120 million settlement of claims that its reliance on the database led to low reimbursements for procedures performed by out-of-network providers. The Aetna agreement joins previous UCR settlements by UnitedHealth Group Incorporated and Health Net Inc. UCR suits are still pending against Cigna Corporation and WellPoint Inc.
But the potential resolution of the Aetna case doesn’t necessarily mean that the Cigna and WellPoint suits will be wrapped up soon, said D. Brian Hufford of Pomerantz Grossman Hufford Dahlstrom & Gross. His firm, which was first retained by the American Medical Association for UCR litigation in 2001, served as chair of the plaintiffs’ executive committee in the Aetna litigation. “This settlement doesn’t mean that those cases will settle, or for how much, because those cases involve other issues about how [Cigna and WellPoint] process claims,” Hufford said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
